"What's the harm in just changing these two little pieces?"
. . . r k . . . 8 . . . . . r . . 7 . Q . . . . . . 6 . . . . . . . . 5 . . b . . . . . 4 . . . p . . . . 3 . . . . . R . . 2 . B . . . . . . 1 a b c d e f g h
(check the solution)
Sample Games
1. e2-e4 e7-e5
2. Nb1-c3 Nb8-c6
3. g2-g4 Bf8-c5
4. Qd1/g4/g7/h8
(the 1st swap sequence, Qh8 threats Q:g7)
r . b q k . n Q 8
p p p p . p r p 7
. . n . . . . . 6
. . b . p . . . 5
. . . . O . p . 4
. . N . . . . . 3
O O O O . O . O 2
R . B O K B N R 1
a b c d e f g h
4...
Qd8-h4
5. Qh8/h7/g7/g8+
(white don't mind the mate threath, and start checking)
r . b . k . Q p 8
p p p p . p n r 7
. . n . . . . . 6
. . b . p . . . 5
. . . . O . p q 4
. . N . . . . . 3
O O O O . O . O 2
R . B O K B N R 1
a b c d e f g h
5...
Ke8-e7
6. Nc3-d5+ Ke7-e6
7. Nd5:c7+ Ke6-d6
8. Nc7-b5+ Kd6-e7
9. Qg8/c8/c6/c5+
(the mate threath ended)
r . n . . . b p 8
p p . p k p n r 7
. . b . . . . . 6
. N Q . p . . . 5
. . . . O . p q 4
. . . . . . . . 3
O O O O . O . O 2
R . B O K B N R 1
a b c d e f g h
9...
Ke7-e8
10. Bf1-c4? Qh4/h2/h1/g1+
r . n . k . b p 8
p p . p . p n r 7
. . b . . . . . 6
. N Q . p . . . 5
. . B . O . p O 4
. . . . . . . . 3
O O O O . O . R 2
R . B O K . q N 1
a b c d e f g h
11. Bc4-f1
(if 11. Ke1-e2 then Rh7/h6/g4/e4+)
11... Qg1:h2?
(if 11... Rh7/g7/f7/f2/f1+ then Qc5 was lost)
12. Bb5/c6/d7+
r . n . k . b p 8
p p . B . p n r 7
. . p . . . . . 6
. b Q . p . . . 5
. . . . O . p O 4
. . . . . . . . 3
O O O O . O . q 2
R . B O K N . N 1
a b c d e f g h
12...
Ke8:d7
13. Nf1:h2 f7-f6
14. Nh2:g4?
(better 14. Nh2/g4/f6+)
14... Rh7/g7/g4/h4/h1+
r . n . . . b p 8
p p . k . . N n 7
. . p . . p . . 6
. b Q . p . . . 5
. . . . O . O N 4
. . . . . . . . 3
O O O O . O . . 2
R . B O K . . r 1
a b c d e f g h
15. Qf2/e1/d1/c1/c2 Nh7/f6/g4+
16. Kf2-f3 Nc8/a7/c6/e5+
17. Kf3-g3 h:g7
18. Bd1:g4+ Ne5:g4
19. Kg3:g4 Bg8-e6+
r . p . . . . . 8
p p . k . . p p 7
. . p . b O . . 6
. b O . . . . . 5
. . . . O . K N 4
. . . . . . . . 3
O O Q O . . . . 2
R . O . O . . r 1
a b c d e f g h
20. Kg4-g3 g:f6
21. Qc2/e4/h7+ Ra8/a7/b7/d7
p . p . . . . . 8
p k . r . . . Q 7
. . p . b p . . 6
. b O . . . . . 5
. . . . p . . N 4
. . . . . . K . 3
O O O O . . . . 2
R . O . O . . r 1
a b c d e f g h
22. Qh7:e4 Be6-d5
23. Qe4/c2 Rd7-g7+
24. Kg3-f2 Rh1-f1+
p . p . . . . . 8
p k . . . . r . 7
. . p . . p . . 6
. b O b . . . . 5
. . . . O . . N 4
. . . . . . . . 3
O O Q O . K . . 2
R . O . O r . . 1
a b c d e f g h
25. Kf2-e3 Rg7-g3+
26. Ke3-d4 Rf1-f4
27. d2-d3 Rf4:h4
28. a2-a4 Bb5/d3??
(why? the position seems bad for white!)
p . p . . . . . 8
p k . . . . . . 7
. . p . . p . . 6
. O O b . . . . 5
O . . K O . . r 4
. . . b . . r . 3
. O Q . . . . . 2
R . O . O . . . 1
a b c d e f g h
29. Qc2/d3/e4/d5/c6+ Kb7-b8
30. Ra1/a4/a7/a8+ Be4/d5/c6/a8
31. Qd5-d6+ Kb8-b7
32. Qd6-c7+ Ba8/b7
k . p . . . . . 8
p b Q . . . . . 7
. . R . . p . . 6
. O O . . . . . 5
p . . K p . . r 4
. . . O . . r . 3
. O b . . . . . 2
O . O . O . . . 1
a b c d e f g h
33. Rc6/c7/c8+ Bb7/c8
34. R:c7+
Bc2/d3/e4/c6
35. Qe4/c6+ Ka8-b8
(35... Be4/c6 is illegal because of the KO rule)
36. Rc7:c8++
1-0
final position:
. k R . . . . . 8
p . . . . . . . 7
. . Q . . p . . 6
. O O . . . . . 5
p . . K b . . r 4
. . . p . . r . 3
. O O . . . . . 2
O . O . O . . . 1
a b c d e f g h
White: Joao Neto (Nutty Knights)
Black: Ralph Betza (Remarkable Rookies)
Result: 1-0
Date: February 1998
1. Rh1/h2/g1/g2/f1/f2/e2/d1/d2/c1/c2/b1/b2/a1/a2
1... (WD)b8-b6
2. (fbNF)h2-g4
2... (RN)d8/e8/g7/g4/f2/h1/h7(h1=RN)/h8/f7/f8/d7/b6/
/b2/b1/c1/a2/a7/a8/c7/c8/e7/g8
3. (fbNF)g7-f6
3... (HFD)c7:b6
4. (fbNF)f6:g8
4... (RN)h1:g1 ??
5. (fhNrlbK)g2:g1
5... (R4)a7/b7/b6/b2/b1/a1/a2(a1=RN)
6. b:a2
6... (RN)a1/a2/b2/b6/b7/d7/e7/f7/h8/g8
7. (fhNrlbK)d2-c4
7... (R4)h7:h8
8. (frlRbK)c1/a1/a2/b2/c2/e2
8... (RN)g8:g4
9. (fhNrlbK)g1-f3
9... (HFD)b6-e6
10. (fbNF)b2-a4
10...(HFD)e7-e4+
Final Position:
---------------
R4 WD HFD RN K HFD WD R4
---------------
p . p k p p . r
p n . n . p . .
. . . . b . . .
. . . . . . . .
N . B . b . q .
. . . . . B . .
O . Q . R O . .
O . O O K O . .
---------------
frlRbK fbNF fhNrlbK fhNfrlRK K fhNrlbK bfNF frlRbK
---------------
Notes:
Betza wrote:
>But then I would have had a nice swap defense. A swap attack can't
>capture anything, and it can't give double check, and it can't do
>anything offensively deadly except get a Pawn to the 7th or 8th rank.
Neto wrote:
you're right! Swapping must be improved to be useful on a chess variant...
One possible modification is that a move consists of:
a) a regular move,
b) a 2 piece swap.
It's near marsellais chess, and reduce drastically the move possibilities.
Betza wrote:
a) a regular move,
must be the first part of the move and must get
you out of check,
therefore swapping is no longer such a powerful
defense.
b) a 2 piece swap
"Qd1/e2"? or "Qd1/e2/f2"?
Not an unlimited swap because it would be even
"heavier", I understand.
and then balanced swap chess has born...
back to top
White queen swaps with the white bishop, then with the black pawn promoting it to a knight, then with the black bishop and the black rook, mating Black. The notation would be:
1. 1 Qb6/b1/d3=N/c4/f7++
. . . r k . . . 8
. . . . . Q . . 7
. B . . . . . . 6
. . . . . . . . 5
. . r . . . . . 4
. . . b . . . . 3
. . . . . R . . 2
. n . . . . . . 1
a b c d e f g h
back to top